This is Carol, Roger's wife. As discussed yesterday, we are glad to report that media coverage of the Legal Schnauzer first amendment case continues to expand. Once again, one of the more interesting articles published recently appeared in the WhoWhatWhy website on Nov. 25. It was written by David J. Krajicek who paid Roger a visit in jail and did his first jailhouse interview.
Here is the link to the article: In Jailhouse Interview, Alabama Blogger Says He Won't Budge
This article was very well done also. And again, I very much appreciate all the hard work and effort that went into it.
However, there was one statement that was highly inaccurate and it misrepresents a very important point:
The LS blog posts concerning this unlawful traffic stop appear here, here and here.
Here is the link to the article: In Jailhouse Interview, Alabama Blogger Says He Won't Budge
This article was very well done also. And again, I very much appreciate all the hard work and effort that went into it.
However, there was one statement that was highly inaccurate and it misrepresents a very important point:
"Shuler insisted he was not legally served because the documents were not placed in his hand."I have no clue how or why the above statement was even in the article because it has absolutely NO basis in fact and Roger NEVER said any such thing. It is utterly and completely false. To understand the truth about what happened during the bogus and unlawful "service" during the phony traffic stop and the pertinent law involved, please read the blog posts written by Roger Shuler himself on Legal Schnauzer.
